返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
/ V, G8 m% v! M
8 w; o0 |/ ^/ E5 Y5 ^: ~7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
, q  I* D! ?; n+ S$ d0 t# FThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
. Y8 [7 F4 n3 @range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with$ V& b# L7 n( Q+ \/ {0 V
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
! Q" O. K0 d: I$ F0 ?' YGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but. s2 b1 m8 D% P$ A
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will: U2 L8 X) B" C" I% I1 B
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
! o" i6 _( W$ d7 B3 D' gand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when% i6 r9 `1 Z% Y4 H' J! g( q
planning operations that require such high risk.
; F; P2 t# O3 b6 P& H4 W) n谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
" y' ~5 N+ ^1 i- s2 A! n( T/ T1 E- E" z$ s: t; u
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理8 u9 L: ^8 _. @
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表