返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 " [2 ~. a2 c9 [3 V

5 b$ R1 i& U) U# p3 j3 \+ [2 Q7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE' E5 P' M" W; G: h$ A4 `: Z, A; h/ f
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended" E+ D7 u7 S5 q6 U3 M9 W
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
% R: A9 ]. @" s& Dinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of5 A+ W$ j! M% a' f
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
( {2 U- r2 F- T' i* b3 scould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
: ]3 J; E$ M. H+ w8 I$ Isuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal. v1 w) j: s0 i& [
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
+ g& z# `; k  Y- \: y! K0 Aplanning operations that require such high risk.
1 a, `9 p+ H+ J1 x5 x4 u谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 , N6 y3 a, {6 c( O8 t
6 X- e* g8 o0 v% q8 V/ |- s
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理1 Q+ l1 x8 E" v+ C
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表