返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
4 X8 t9 _: |) w
1 X, {' v, E  x' t% }7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
2 X0 g8 ]: R: P+ c) nThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
, q$ Q/ J& K! U( Q4 \/ J2 l4 Lrange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
2 w  n* a" `2 q3 F; zinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
$ ?/ v: ~% _6 F- Z. \- P9 wGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but% M8 Y) M5 m1 p* r; k
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will; T0 Q4 x2 n. q/ C1 D" f; i
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
! v* W/ v* J2 Uand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
) o% @2 C" P7 o/ j3 W" H0 @planning operations that require such high risk.5 S3 o9 b2 j& D/ Q  n2 ~8 l
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 . A8 @2 Y& j$ e. D7 Y
0 `/ `) y9 I1 A, r
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
! m: i8 H7 ]4 U- _$ e$ ]扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表