返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 7 p2 b/ W) P. a+ ?" H
* n: E, {; T; l$ o, R2 p) |# h
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
( K- Q4 q8 |9 {1 j' P5 ~) L7 `The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
5 W( Z4 R+ @* s) v6 crange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
. G9 N# [! k# S5 I: J% kinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
0 I+ w7 u" t$ ]Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but. @1 w: K- a+ y+ t* R5 \7 z4 r
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will9 h/ I* {9 N9 z& `2 J/ Z5 S9 N
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
0 n2 b( l$ o+ R- s' \and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
* w4 h/ K: e" y/ a  ]* }planning operations that require such high risk.$ E3 f5 v% `9 N5 b0 F
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 7 d- m' b, U8 {1 s4 Y+ s
% D4 g, q+ C. f
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
; G% L4 _( N% g; f2 W: {扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表