返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 9 }, J1 V( |3 v, \

2 ?( B$ Q0 Z" H+ F7 U, A! Q& o* H9 l7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
1 ^5 F# r1 b; V2 n5 ~8 ?6 JThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
" h+ y* \0 I) A; E$ K; Erange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with- V2 P8 J/ N8 {, M' y# O: l0 O
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
( m; N# ?9 N0 R- l/ NGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but, r; `/ q8 ^" \8 c. Q8 L2 v
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will3 ^& W9 i: E4 I7 ^, ?
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal5 b. ]) U1 o/ u+ \) j
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
) f* Z, W1 X# i/ N4 ]! Kplanning operations that require such high risk.
4 f4 @2 e# @: i& M4 `& y谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 . U; E& s8 M6 T4 i" U0 s

0 g/ a' _5 J2 p! ~* {中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
) k: ]6 i- ?' O. s, m! T扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表