返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 1 Y) F& Z) u5 t: [5 l1 a
) a' Y5 c% K3 S% d6 r' Q" l1 t
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE! x4 b; Q* Q* }% L" c' `( x6 a
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended9 l2 F) X8 n3 k1 J  F8 m. k
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
* s! t3 H% N9 R( H5 a* `instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
" g4 ^+ ^. o0 ^! Q) {4 l2 E! pGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
# `3 Q, Z8 W: [) p; ucould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
1 K5 U* j3 y% z5 D9 b' `9 [0 J. U. z4 Csuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
9 V0 X! H: [+ o+ h: F. ^and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
! J1 F8 z7 l0 @# i$ p  lplanning operations that require such high risk.
/ M' E1 {" Y. @9 n: [8 R6 O, {9 F谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 ) d1 J; \( _: R$ E0 J
3 t0 i/ w# |) G9 x+ {( s
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
) w+ r- U8 R8 }扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表