返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
! O) \( i( z% Q8 B4 F5 A, J' |" n$ X4 U1 t
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE3 a! n2 y) k; d. ?3 y7 [- N
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended3 W+ b1 l. l  \# `5 l* v
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with% m) i  E; m9 W  E1 R" ?8 s7 }
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of0 [, z  |1 O. ?' A8 }" i
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but6 s. S' T+ n' P% M, J
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
, o! B, a' V  W( f4 ksuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
4 u7 X0 N! h7 Z5 N  a' Mand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when& \* B' M1 y0 p) o( t* W: H
planning operations that require such high risk.! `. E% b* R8 G( V9 F2 \9 v
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 ( y6 O1 U) y. ?0 i. ?+ m( S

2 L2 l( K6 ]& ^中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理8 q% F8 l1 a  ?# g3 c6 c; X
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表