返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
, ?7 d6 @: z- v5 @" |* j+ ?
1 v0 v6 s' j% x3 z7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
% T$ Z- Z0 w6 @2 e! \The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
6 A- p7 I. x9 M% _8 T1 }( J! R: orange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with8 R* {0 Z- _( S  F& V$ q5 a* X" n0 q
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
# l% n, W1 V, s3 B0 \3 nGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but5 R8 c4 U: g) o& N6 `' t
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will  K6 t. U7 ?# r9 h/ @
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
& b& w8 x5 N3 x% K& Nand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when5 R  K) U% G) i; o, S: X
planning operations that require such high risk.8 B$ U+ I; ]3 q  w/ J
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
- H0 m3 y2 @: d
3 v, z0 h) u8 C8 N: x; k  h中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理: O1 ^( a  W" Y% N+ G* w! p5 O
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表