返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
. X% W1 O" J/ n* v! e: g' P4 T: s! R3 |- u% w
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE, ?& b4 c' q( p. C
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended% N8 o9 d  g" Y# n8 F
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
! A8 w6 A! a# Q, einstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of' \9 d# c& N2 _) r
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but: i/ Z, J0 @  b5 ]$ _. K5 Q" P
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will  Z( s; O7 o! |/ n. G  [- Z
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
$ h' T5 J4 a" eand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
/ E. r  R2 K# ^2 X4 Lplanning operations that require such high risk.
( E8 c! S1 d9 q" {) k谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 9 s* s2 x7 I1 [4 g3 ^

7 b& }: U0 Z" `. j6 p% E# f中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
9 y' q# {6 w; a6 Q9 x& e7 f0 v+ M扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表