返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
, _* q& c1 W: r' K: Y+ J! _- e; ?
7 I4 A7 s* A- i$ i9 V7 }: v2 ^# w) j7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE6 ]+ N' A7 V0 J
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
' e3 t% u0 A2 B8 D; Q+ Srange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with8 w3 R2 L2 n5 f; g$ T
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
* T: ~* x, y8 w) ?Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but' ?% _% Q9 z2 y/ }+ C
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
7 @, _' t; V- Y; esuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
# z7 _$ }& m. Cand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when% z; u7 H) j/ ]+ D
planning operations that require such high risk.. I# U4 E8 _0 ]7 p' X" Z5 l
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 ; M: q! X8 I" X' m

3 C+ {; M: K6 _# @1 `中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理4 N; F4 B4 X2 R
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表