返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 / U2 L5 {$ F$ q+ G$ q

" C% R1 {/ b1 V2 |( m% k& X, g+ D7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
0 z/ [  z3 o$ C+ uThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
" J* M- G  Y  g1 ?range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
; }3 J) F3 g5 |; P% Minstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
4 t& Y0 P3 t0 E8 `* [$ lGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
8 U7 u" z& r0 [; ^$ b( Q) u- ccould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
' i$ a& y1 m! g# d- s; i( esuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
' ?6 d* c% N* ?& n2 ^and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when/ A7 ^0 x8 }- y" t3 v, b
planning operations that require such high risk.
4 z4 U4 V8 j$ o4 m" e1 y4 J' j谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 ; Y% i; x. w& x* ^7 C" v5 X
- U/ a5 p2 I) F1 P
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理: l8 Q7 i$ b5 B
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表