返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 . ]5 `- g5 {* i) w9 f
& }$ A9 u& H7 c5 ^
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
% c) ~3 G7 S6 pThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended# s; d) a% y' ^3 k; ?% e1 D) ~
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
; _% q0 z1 q0 s5 einstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
2 M& y& `& b. Y5 x( dGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but- x' X9 W4 c. E( i3 z9 L
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will! h  A- g9 s. ?6 q* ]
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
# S6 L% ^0 j  ^6 ?8 a: N7 Yand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when! i# t+ {0 ?# I. k0 M* m  e5 O
planning operations that require such high risk.
( o; l3 q- t, y- {, m: B  R" z: ?% ?谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 " P$ t7 \8 @1 {0 u2 h, [

8 G+ v8 a& l7 ^. x" [中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
- Y" m5 n5 ~- `5 S! @扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表