返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 8 I9 ~4 N  `# |7 z# t
+ `) S, I' v& T: f9 P# q( c- W
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
+ {) s7 }* E8 a2 }1 z) w. {The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended# K5 u7 N. d" y5 V. A4 i! m' i
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with+ R' M9 F$ x( `1 `: r' L7 s
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
( }" c& [" E. w  L2 Y' pGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but$ [7 d& i* M  E( M- a
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will- I) `8 a) X$ I3 U
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal( ?" {/ V: N; S1 {& C  o( Q4 V
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when6 F# H- h) K6 P+ v0 Q4 y0 C& ?
planning operations that require such high risk.
2 N2 s: N/ d7 o, S) l# b7 i% \谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
7 I5 ?! l$ T( R5 z$ Y
& A3 `6 o5 H9 P& i中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
7 a1 n2 p% Y8 V. M5 E$ O7 Y扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表