返回列表 回复 发帖

对汉化witp游戏的一点提议

本帖最后由 kong12 于 2009-10-29 15:40 编辑 ; ^; I. h3 T# J7 E1 [
4 B% d6 |4 o* y. @0 e. R4 _
英文手册原文4 b4 o7 A" ^+ _

( R/ X2 i* a% e( \, c# mWhen a TF is docked in a port, its ships are still listed as part of the TF. . }- w' }% k! V- [1 V! B6 r
) G0 c6 O! z) O. z- ?& R( Q
A TF may disband itself if it is in a hex with a friendly port with a current size of at least 3. When a TF is disbanded, each of the ships that were in the TF will replenish its ammunition. Ships at a friendly port with a current size of at least 3 may exist in the port separate of a task force in which case they will maximize their repair capability at the expense of additional vulnerability to enemy air and ship bombardment attacks (this is considered being at anchor).# @4 g6 [1 v+ v4 t; X5 C

5 V" _5 [: O, \2 `& \0 o就是说dock 是 停泊(舰队不解散只靠港), anchor是抛锚(即舰队解散在港口里)& F6 L  Z/ {# H

! z- p( p- H$ C4 O6 N8 k中文witp的基地信息界面里的 停泊在某港的船只 会引起歧义。 建议改为 抛锚 符合原意。
嗯,确实是这样,不过习惯就好啦,最近不打算对WITP的汉化再进行更新
The most persistent sound which reverberates through man's history is the beating of war drums.
本帖最后由 kong12 于 2009-10-29 09:45 编辑 ; n: c" l8 l* _7 F: m- ?, P

9 V# J$ l  ?9 Z清楚这个区别挺重要的
% w6 L  w' R% Y* [! c
- J. D0 e. L+ l- Z抛锚或者停泊的船只不会受到因航行引起的系统损伤。(和舰队在海上对比)& z- e0 N6 n  V" [4 S1 M
空袭会对停泊的舰队造成更大杀伤(和舰队在海上对比)
0 t6 N2 w- O4 k+ m" T空袭和对岸炮击会对抛锚的船只造成更大杀伤(和舰队停泊对比)
& U4 H+ @: n7 x2 R我军舰队只有对岸炮击才能攻击敌军抛锚的船只。
, }/ _4 G4 H4 D' X5 K潜艇无法攻击抛锚的船只或者在3级或以上港口停泊的船只。
7 L. z% F' x" ?7 e# u! {' a抛锚的船只和停泊的舰队相比,能最大的发挥修复能力。
停泊应该是在港口所在60英里的格子里巡航,抛锚是解散编队进入港口的泊位
停泊应该是在港口所在60英里的格子里巡航,抛锚是解散编队进入港口的泊位- a7 }) S/ ]' Y
左京大人 发表于 2009-10-29 10:59
- D, n$ G( B6 M; e! F' n

0 U) r/ e7 @) p9 S你说的那个是出港,停泊是要舰队进港才算的。
. e( A; n/ z! V6 M2 t- l, }( X. d可以在舰队信息界面最左上角看到
返回列表