燃烧的岛群军史学习论坛 - Powered by Discuz! Board

标题: 日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达 [打印本页]

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:07 标题: 日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43
" ^# s. A& W2 v+ m2 M1 [
Japanese aircraft
Ki-100 Tony x 36 / Z7 I5 x1 w$ U% O

Allied aircraft
B-29 Superfortress x 33 8 N% J; s. h+ E: n0 S( F
+ D) @4 b: t* C
Japanese aircraft losses 5 z5 s' S0 ]4 m, j9 n% S- j
Ki-100 Tony: 12 damaged
, G- d1 R( G; T. b$ O p
Allied aircraft losses
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
34 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
+ Z7 p5 I" u4 k# k ]' D+ G
Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 13 ! @" t2 d: e/ f" v; N$ V7 }1 a

原来B-29真是纸老虎，日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差，但结果却有天壤之别。& X: m& ?0 v1 D7 T) A$ e( g$ K
" q" j7 G: h" i! [
从这些战果看，得出对付B-29的结论是，日本夜间防空没戏，速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要（没有机炮的先靠边站）。
4 E9 \, X. o9 U* k

Our fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25! 6 o' |. U5 v" N5 M+ x8 h
Can't keep this up for long

  G+ O$ W0 X* {* L- G
Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51 : p: |) S) J5 ~* n& O: [

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 20
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 24
5 m& g6 U4 _8 S' ~; \
Allied aircraft
B-29 Superfortress x 260 , k! l# k' Z+ m
& b# j, M* ]& y# P8 f0 F4 k) x) M
Japanese aircraft losses - S  B) ]) m& N
A6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged # |( ~& \1 k2 @8 q

Allied aircraft losses $ C7 B% G' n' {9 x
B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged
: h, {+ n8 g7 I" y# Q# E% O
Japanese ground losses:
204 casualties reported
Guns lost 5 9 a2 m% y: k  |( o7 B6 @7 I0 Y8 q

Airbase hits 66
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 364
/ M2 {) _& K7 R* K; p
! o0 P" K4 |6 l2 Y/ r
这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢，我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的，空中损失的主要是五式战，紫电被击伤的多，击落的少。

Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52
5 d3 F# n8 i9 o3 X
Japanese aircraft & B7 X% k# H% l. H9 Y+ ^
A6M5 Zeke x 4 4 F) X: T* i6 w6 }8 n
N1K1-J George x 33
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5
Ki-100 Tony x 18

Allied aircraft + F3 O; v; r4 T  j. Y, P5 ^$ F
B-29 Superfortress x 155 7 L+ c7 G: g% e7 C3 d
+ c9 C9 e8 B2 [* j3 L. D
Japanese aircraft losses , `! a7 {0 d# p
A6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed 8 O5 r# C7 n; o6 R5 V# v% |3 h6 E
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged 9 c1 k$ o& j4 }0 k# I$ J
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged 5 w" D& n; ]% C% r8 q" {
Ki-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
H6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed 4 m: Y5 C8 T1 e# n
Ki-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged1 d5 t7 }9 G, c% v4 j/ d
1 T" P3 a+ i/ X# ?/ v
[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:20

疾风丙终于表演了一次，太差了…………远不如五式战，怎么搞得。

3 C8 i1 A, T/ A- \( A; ?. E

Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54
7 ?+ B% `: N3 G' q7 O2 n' H7 s2 m
Japanese aircraft
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 31   W# d: t; y! m- G

Allied aircraft
B-29 Superfortress x 12

海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低，或者调高日军飞机战斗力，否则的话海盗等于零，因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。* x( e2 m" V, E$ g5 X$ `
0 H& j  M& z; g" P" K
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52

Japanese aircraft 5 \8 {6 ~8 B9 A7 D+ E7 u
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 22
Ki-100 Tony x 15
Ki-102a Randy x 13
/ Q6 W. @4 s% m7 U" e2 v
Allied aircraft & V9 |! Q% K' e( L1 L5 t/ ?% p6 G; ~
F4U-1D Corsair x 20 9 u2 }9 @, }1 E& b! N! a2 Q- e/ E

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed
Ki-102a Randy: 2 destroyed
& H' r( X/ t+ l) D
Allied aircraft losses
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged # M' e5 G! q; \. |( {& H" s" m

& V8 _& A& R+ {) H1 P& B2 U2 n1 \0 M
Japanese aircraft losses 2 |' f* [, d. U1 Z
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged ( B) |- e* G7 g/ J% I) g
# C. [2 K3 L% p. y% M$ d1 a3 j  T% H
Allied aircraft losses
B-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:24

198架神风出击，只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧，还嫌停机率不够高？早说了，Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………8 S; [- P; }. W: g5 N

虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了，但就算没有防空…………( i) V) n7 N$ M+ X' T) j

Day Air attack on TF at 52,52 , }+ F% ^ s, K: u4 }3 u3 q! d

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 32
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2 $ `' k0 x7 e7 K6 B' F. U7 d2 C: [1 o
3 Q, X: q4 n1 x! O# q% Q0 M
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed

Allied Ships ) S# Y) @* A$ F0 s" f/ x
APD John P. Gray - i, G' ~2 W$ f: }1 d# \
APD Ray K. Edwards
AK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1
DE Day # G: N9 _' d7 k0 A+ Q! }8 X

Allied ground losses:
51 casualties reported $ p9 R; x9 z! G9 t
Guns lost 2 + p6 ^9 y( W e" J! T. w) G
Vehicles lost 1

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:27

游戏里应该嵌入代码，大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失，现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。

作者: bf109 时间: 2007-6-24 18:36

看看后期盟军强到什么地步，0比1也能赢？？5 _. X; }9 D' t' @" `
5 I- v+ k q1 K8 |/ r" T( z# U
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人？？

0 w% C8 X% E: v. x  x6 b* C2 d1 z$ N8 r. m

! v4 Q" `' H( l" G* m4 l
Ground combat at Kuala

Allied Shock attack
  k# B2 q- q# Y- [' ^
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2 * M! e' f# S+ _; N3 @

Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5 % t/ A5 ], D3 k
% m2 K- @* l2 f
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0 5 C9 ^! q7 c# E$ l
$ a1 K& H0 g+ r- u. o
Japanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0) & c( G" O- d" \

Allied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!!
9 ^/ d, F; K! J! y+ m0 J5 M* O! c
& T0 O6 r8 D, U* m  ?! u; ^% |+ V
Allied ground losses: - `3 k$ ~6 N3 T; r0 z
24 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

作者: chars 时间: 2007-6-24 19:06

原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表( O; L3 ]- k2 ]. O- F9 {" k
看看后期盟军强到什么地步，0比1也能赢？？3 v$ _9 E3 d4 }6 D- o! E
. b3 }: h: k. q% ~( R
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人？？ : q7 l. @8 k) z5 {4 q+ X' j% O# l

2 h3 x! @+ m6 C5 s! A/ b5 a
2 o" K9 H2 H7 b* @  l9 [4 b- FGround combat at Kuala
8 K" w/ C) B  P3 |0 t! U6 }- d# F- a: G/ Z5 E4 {3 q0 U2 m- {
Allied Shock attack
' i, N6 Q! [. F7 M6 O
% h, g& P2 @: t/ Q. g2 x  NAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...

: K. y) q9 K% }: g( [
+ M6 e/ @+ P! ]6 r, j9 g$ k$ c

这个…………难道最后四个都是史太龙？？

作者: 飞龙 时间: 2007-6-24 19:10

这四个明显是逃兵啊，死的那24个才是战胜鬼子的英雄

作者: zhengxuacmilan 时间: 2007-6-25 10:18 标题: 回复 #5 bf109 的帖子

不敢相信啊，这怎么可能！

作者: harry 时间: 2007-6-25 10:45

估计4个人还是剩下一门炮的炮兵。。。。。

作者: hades1001 时间: 2007-6-25 11:15

这一场陆战真是匪夷所思啊...

作者: xuanyuan 时间: 2007-6-25 16:57

死24个人打败鬼子也算惨胜了，但0：1的比分就不能理解了

作者: Muller 时间: 2007-7-12 11:24

原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表
" N! h! @0 k" H看看后期盟军强到什么地步，0比1也能赢？？6 z0 f$ G5 t: {9 u' p& f+ x0 e
( o# z( v- S0 X
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人？？ . K- U. \" r! d9 F: D; I0 H
; H/ ~5 J9 x( |

; [4 {) Y* i+ B& c! W4 {; mGround combat at Kuala 8 L/ A8 R4 z6 D- A
) j, g! K# R! P5 l
Allied Shock attack
! K% H+ d7 d+ _9 y! c" X# g& U# Q! O X4 r# a
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...

$ _6 b, K" O6 p5 J8 j- i
( w8 h5 M! q5 h9 a& Y; A! n6 B
所以说游戏毕竟还是游戏。。发挥想象吧各位。。深究就没必要了哈！

作者: 阿姆罗 时间: 2007-7-12 11:49

那4个都是蓝博,有什么好奇怪的.

欢迎光临燃烧的岛群军史学习论坛 (http://bikooo.com/)