返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43
8 C' |& W* C; T" e
" M9 @# R* K8 }+ ^: HJapanese aircraft - ^1 x! G: b) c2 I8 ^/ l
Ki-100 Tony x 36
2 E. ?6 V1 [( n4 N. A$ e+ E) t3 `8 K& ~- y& z* g0 i
Allied aircraft 8 P; P' h% @1 h( U8 a
B-29 Superfortress x 33
# _. R. Y9 l0 E: w+ p
5 M8 L! ~' f1 `" w) P" N4 yJapanese aircraft losses
: f  n0 h8 U! d  p; kKi-100 Tony: 12 damaged + K! ]- s) W( Z
+ q- Y/ X% ~6 W8 Z- j
Allied aircraft losses
4 X0 I( z2 j4 x$ \- cB-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed
5 n$ i* Y' r- W6 G  F, h& \2 _+ @* {. N
Japanese ground losses:
' H6 T; g4 b2 B0 w34 casualties reported 3 p, h3 O$ V- }' F$ u' ^
Guns lost 1
! ?8 s6 s, c$ p' S% t% x3 m3 v4 V3 V
% l1 T8 w) ?, \4 eAirbase hits 5
2 E# B* T- x2 G" X  T4 TAirbase supply hits 2 6 A7 a/ p" `3 L4 \
Runway hits 13 * F; a, Y" @4 G8 D; J

) m; K* ]7 L9 ^3 {. b  t6 s2 c- H: C( o; E0 q( s
原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。5 M0 ~: X) S& {0 G% v% a. U% G( m6 ~
& ?3 i% D( b' V8 S3 L' N
从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。* L+ Y4 [/ `$ C2 o. S0 R4 W# N- Y/ K
$ O* K8 @' }0 g: X# y, y

2 M# M7 x: n, l$ b/ zOur fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25!
$ M1 [: Y# T1 _  ~, f: _Can't keep this up for long % c/ z# F/ z8 F( u3 ~
# X/ v+ B" `5 l1 T
Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51
6 R# {* W0 D) P& X- w0 p  P( D9 X- m- T/ X$ `# i  c; Z; a* P* m
Japanese aircraft
4 O/ A+ y2 l) c  D3 {+ D9 VA6M5 Zeke x 20
5 O; [1 h, V0 S- R& `3 W9 ^Ki-84-Ic Frank x 24 & P. \5 J2 V6 @' z. C' [

1 k0 K' n* v, k, OAllied aircraft , ^$ `0 `" N1 U. _- [; H& R
B-29 Superfortress x 260
  P0 {( U" A  a- e8 @( f) T
0 N; \8 S/ I8 r% l/ a/ U" s8 }  C2 R0 HJapanese aircraft losses
9 q5 }- o$ m7 F7 t0 T: rA6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged % t) l9 _& o# r; ~# y8 t+ T
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged
7 H! R7 p* T# {+ k5 p+ R) _, M- {5 P; e* J3 t- G
Allied aircraft losses
, y, Q2 p! O% r5 ?! `B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged 7 L+ {3 v7 E$ G+ D7 t

! ~5 K7 }; i& \8 }$ tJapanese ground losses: ( z: c) V9 l$ G; h  x
204 casualties reported 0 _) c4 ~. b* n. ?+ Z
Guns lost 5 ; I8 t1 A6 e. k: }5 q
9 V' }& E, x# [9 V/ b
Airbase hits 66
+ \) I: _0 a- q8 E" K* g, E- P6 M  UAirbase supply hits 5 - V% K  c  o; g- j+ G: _
Runway hits 364
! ]9 J) T2 d, Q! }0 x. F
% E$ F$ P/ F9 s0 G- S( g; q
5 D3 d* Z7 _! j1 d/ Q7 ]) B这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。
. W: _! P0 m1 v" r# X( Y
7 t4 N8 P' ]$ ^0 ~Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 ! z  Y* _, i9 r) ^8 q1 t0 _2 N+ j3 u

3 [/ m0 }8 r1 J$ u8 j. IJapanese aircraft 6 ?6 y. a1 O7 T# N
A6M5 Zeke x 4 7 L/ e$ e/ R! a3 ?1 n- W
N1K1-J George x 33 & `/ g' @1 q( g- s$ l- P. ]
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5
( I9 v1 y/ P( }7 n( I( a( l) gKi-100 Tony x 18
- `+ f5 w' R" y
1 D  f/ s5 S5 _" B9 w& R. f  |Allied aircraft 0 k; ]& N+ L, j9 ^6 t# _
B-29 Superfortress x 155 / _' ^, w6 V5 `0 p% D
& Z1 {" b3 E/ G  U/ m
Japanese aircraft losses / B: F! ~& q6 F
A6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed 3 S% ]+ y' z7 z& m: W: T
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged
2 ]. y% ?' h  Y' U9 n$ a. IKi-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
6 u/ B& n2 |3 ?2 [1 m7 X/ sKi-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
0 l/ x/ N, Y. q$ S  F: ?H6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed ! q; O( y' \9 x0 e8 T& H! Q0 w! k7 K
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed , Q5 L1 W2 w7 f& p5 t" M; n8 |# T
Ki-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed
; V2 e3 m  ^7 f" Y5 q" O* X" f6 |, }1 j* J0 r: x" s
Allied aircraft losses
; Z9 T  S  X- l. N4 r+ VB-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged/ \, F- Z( k4 V  T* C; `9 L5 V& r
* D3 E+ K7 c8 [4 Y- ]0 f
[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。
. Q  R  \/ K2 k) H7 _
+ {( U( J" @5 `' SDay Air attack on Naga , at 44,54
% n" B- m2 }3 e1 R& f
3 ]5 l  E0 s2 U) H1 {( n. oJapanese aircraft
4 U5 [. @6 n( r8 FKi-84-Ic Frank x 31 5 y% R0 X$ k! N5 U/ ^

: H! `$ f1 P- z  X# ?( Z, nAllied aircraft ! w. N' d1 Q3 V7 e
B-29 Superfortress x 12
* J0 @* Z* \/ e2 y
+ G3 d) K( e  f- ?$ g0 Q  Z6 q4 x海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。
6 R5 _# N' I' _  F, O
' c# n0 _. p+ N6 l" i0 KDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52
& Q& m5 [+ K; @: X" i
. L1 F- J/ E9 x2 lJapanese aircraft
# J) ^# _  f: xKi-84-Ic Frank x 22 7 y7 b8 {! w: w7 n2 u+ Z* [
Ki-100 Tony x 15
( u1 j: a  o  FKi-102a Randy x 13
5 i2 ^1 T" y$ C1 x1 s7 ]6 r% r$ Y4 K- W4 B0 V
Allied aircraft
2 f' r8 m" n/ O4 \* `" QF4U-1D Corsair x 20 1 O* L# T! ~8 v0 D
8 X7 ~# u7 A/ q) E2 h
Japanese aircraft losses
# c- ~2 t( j& N' X  C. \Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged ) x; w: a  j4 D. P1 C
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed
6 W( @2 U: q) _7 M8 D  GKi-102a Randy: 2 destroyed 8 o' |% o+ T* t$ M. v/ D+ C  @

" }; \! j) {% m/ Z9 P& WAllied aircraft losses
& V9 r2 E' r, ?8 H8 ?; s) o& RF4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged 2 e* m8 W: v! K( g! b, \
) z" W; \/ _6 q) _9 ^9 s

4 I, Q% g# |! c/ N: q# R8 ]Japanese aircraft losses " e$ d  N1 j+ o9 [; H- j4 A: Z' t& u
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged * R* K. W- L8 ~9 J$ J

% w3 F4 Y3 L9 j: G- F" N; aAllied aircraft losses # O/ X- e% A2 _7 \: p7 u+ P$ u' H
B-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………
+ g$ Y. o% \$ F
, ^( ~. b; g% ^1 l+ B1 r  }; H: x" e- l  G虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………+ ~1 k9 Q" S/ n4 l
$ b+ P7 Z4 g! o3 o' U7 E
Day Air attack on TF at 52,52 6 T  L# j; m3 y0 A& w
! H% N+ ^1 s1 s* Z* `& E! Y
Japanese aircraft
1 {9 B7 p! t9 z2 Q! KA6M5 Zeke x 32
9 @7 F" `; E6 X* k4 UKi-43-IIa Oscar x 2
5 [3 H7 F- R' |- ^: P* ~1 u/ Q. @2 `  X3 C5 Z
Japanese aircraft losses
5 j. n  g' P5 I  l) V  cA6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed * d  B6 p8 O6 N9 {% u% \: k: D6 F
4 U& Y( z9 ~* ~0 ^" {- l! ]% F* H
Allied Ships
$ P9 A9 M, t% b8 X8 W! `APD John P. Gray
! u! v8 o# \8 i5 b! RAPD Ray K. Edwards . q% Z0 U' ?; |6 J
AK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1 3 g/ \% U. b5 z0 x. b
DE Day 3 a) ^* ^- Y3 G5 w6 c; i
; i! i% d" E7 t* c  y& U/ M6 w" J
Allied ground losses:
% ?# f5 L9 h+ ]; a+ e8 e7 O0 x51 casualties reported
" v+ _3 W  z- p2 o& x! ~, {% aGuns lost 2 7 t6 s. [& p" p. K9 [3 P9 ~) [1 ]
Vehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??. W, r* |2 C& [  f% O8 J+ g, `# y

! K2 v% d! o+ t最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
+ F5 C& A9 S* {! o! g; v" }# g5 M) \) i1 w. u) i" U. r6 [* e5 ~6 h
' ?8 ~- f* q/ u" q' d  P. E
Ground combat at Kuala 5 C6 t; n5 |. ~' a# @+ r
9 p$ T8 U- w+ B- d
Allied Shock attack
; j" h" o( w$ T. X, I  Q4 O) w* N- M* Q1 v( o
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2
7 J* S! G" j5 N  K) J5 I6 z& b5 c7 p- M, R; c
Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5 ) R0 X& m. z3 ]
# x: c% x  o2 F4 D. C7 F; P- d
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0
+ H5 r- u* y3 l8 L& e: T; k" z/ \! @; I1 E! S
Japanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1
2 X8 j& n  ~/ g5 e: s5 }, f, e' f; {% ?1 b% [! k6 A. l' \7 F
Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)
- b5 t) x" \6 w, b
4 `' S% f' D: [8 f& B0 r5 MAllied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!! # P$ m! e) \4 ]$ o' W

7 e: t' ?' T$ K8 j' h$ B% w3 s9 G1 q
Allied ground losses:
" x; G6 o% [3 e) W! S! D- c24 casualties reported ( Q  u' v, V, Z7 I
Guns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
返回列表