返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43 ; l7 G9 r* U/ \  ^2 t
2 p% t3 b% H6 U5 O- P
Japanese aircraft
% P3 X2 z0 c/ o9 c6 qKi-100 Tony x 36 4 _) w2 H: ]9 K9 E4 `+ x

! G3 w$ X8 X/ {  W6 ^Allied aircraft 0 ^+ @. Z5 K6 v
B-29 Superfortress x 33 3 J) a0 O) d( b. J( f
  o1 l! @8 L& ]1 R3 n0 ~0 O
Japanese aircraft losses
: S' ~7 ]9 U0 s: R! R* s) Q3 xKi-100 Tony: 12 damaged ) }2 S% j, V* }: A
: u+ D) `4 `+ F! C+ @8 a6 {
Allied aircraft losses
  [% R& O( Z& ]: R* n" rB-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed
$ W! Q# O# f. R7 l( I4 m% v' t0 ^. U; \8 B8 e) R; O7 O
Japanese ground losses:
; C# p; ~: ^0 [$ C% }& F34 casualties reported
" b8 \% J3 W9 l, N  e; g! G0 }Guns lost 1
# t0 E( _) X- ]$ Y
2 {; t" E& H5 [0 X0 n. V( g/ MAirbase hits 5 6 ]) Z1 L. _% N. I# U  v/ `
Airbase supply hits 2 1 i" }( d* X+ f, v
Runway hits 13 / B) M& i  {/ y) k% ?) @

* {8 b9 l! x& r5 e; y, c: H" N" U3 P* @& I5 z
原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。
6 ^4 E( O4 E6 c$ G% ]. Z4 e0 o# t8 p
从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。
; q' }5 c$ y9 `' ?9 y. \
0 \( Y' o0 A* c* k( G. @
1 r: n( {, |' C' M9 jOur fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25! 6 e+ b# I8 {! `/ D) O! K2 v0 q5 W" p! J
Can't keep this up for long 7 F) _. E. _+ P* @9 S
" o( D/ m) K. t) @
Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51 2 k4 h; e2 Q' v, V$ l4 m
, i. T6 Q6 u  r2 t* j- Y9 E
Japanese aircraft 9 D  s5 r$ y2 z4 q8 Z
A6M5 Zeke x 20 " ?( A$ u3 }; f2 z! [4 J# b
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 24
5 C" v* p0 i* L9 F; u- z! _% s5 s6 {6 X, }
Allied aircraft % M0 J& T# X' q& V/ |6 B
B-29 Superfortress x 260 ; r. H4 R5 v* c

4 I- z, b: J. q; {" r* RJapanese aircraft losses 2 i/ A: u# N+ @1 y( l1 h
A6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged + W7 c* X3 Q9 u% _3 x
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged 6 U. h0 O/ X2 L* z, R# B% z5 I
! H$ F# N5 l  Y
Allied aircraft losses
) v, R4 t% @4 gB-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged - B8 c! Y2 w& s+ A
* U" _6 s" }" A5 T+ X* v
Japanese ground losses: * L& c! Y: s' l: r4 v
204 casualties reported * J. Y2 M( [1 I! H3 S& k: T
Guns lost 5
( |. P; b6 v1 B, }7 J1 Z' }" Q( p* _, b) r
Airbase hits 66 ( @$ J: x1 y* D+ q1 m
Airbase supply hits 5 ) `' a; b& @* R' ?* T$ N, S
Runway hits 364
9 ?% O: s9 p5 F( }* d6 D
' w' W5 d! B" J, o- l/ V ; N0 A, S; c( r$ o. p- K2 ?
这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。
  e6 x" k) ?4 O) d8 H% B
+ R3 o- M/ h4 w  gDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52
  h. L* v( P& v/ ^, B% |  H
7 ?3 h8 o( C# p* A$ XJapanese aircraft
0 n: I, m5 F$ j7 _5 A- nA6M5 Zeke x 4 : f% g# r1 m7 }( z9 h
N1K1-J George x 33
+ q2 V! }# w3 a$ ?7 j! wKi-43-IIa Oscar x 5 ) c- {; M( ^) v, k& u& J
Ki-100 Tony x 18 6 @, o# B5 l5 z; O, B' j  n" P

" w3 z$ ^; _6 n5 i3 d; J4 l+ }Allied aircraft / p9 ~" m- I# H
B-29 Superfortress x 155 ' S. X3 x' `( n6 b( e$ a
3 S6 b9 j/ o$ W2 U- c& ]
Japanese aircraft losses
' U; N" n$ h: ~% e9 VA6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed " p$ |& u( j# }* `, X2 e0 U
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged
  i: G) H: _- L2 S+ \$ o: \" I8 H9 IKi-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged # X! b0 Q5 i2 I# E% |- s
Ki-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
) C' b' h( e2 J2 [4 H! u' ^H6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed 1 p+ x( |3 R0 ]+ B4 a7 {
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed
9 {9 R) ?0 s: C8 ^) J4 |/ IKi-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed % I) W* i" c" q: [' W; M% B- s

/ l) w+ [6 ~/ H: K0 I* YAllied aircraft losses
! E- ]9 Y$ I: L! d4 k- u# ?B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged
* U5 m0 S) F5 X* e/ K# H  E# x4 M: v( H1 Y/ {
[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。
# l: t. x6 f8 e9 M# c4 [( p( Z' |& O$ ?% Z
Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54 0 l7 H* T7 G1 ^& ^3 c

- x  Q9 u  R9 n9 L7 e" {Japanese aircraft   |" c' d* r" W: L- F2 ?
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 31 / d+ @" M* z, L6 R+ E' ~( K# b/ a0 E8 u

+ h& [, k6 f  I$ V4 G% QAllied aircraft
9 Q) V& K9 q& E  T! I8 D4 RB-29 Superfortress x 12 ! t) L# k! M  L- c+ d3 H, \. o
! G: z6 @3 T0 `/ l* m# I$ v
海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。1 N* j5 n+ Q# A* t2 I% U
, Q5 `" C$ V" g- ~
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 2 [6 l% }, N# s& L$ j$ F

1 {" V1 q& u0 T. bJapanese aircraft
  h4 t" q! p( r' C) oKi-84-Ic Frank x 22   \6 Q# ~4 [( B& [0 O* `& v
Ki-100 Tony x 15
# ~8 s: o. ?* F) h; s% {5 HKi-102a Randy x 13
7 F' Y; w5 {" E7 s
9 z, b1 f$ j2 c% k( C9 h1 qAllied aircraft
) {* }+ u! |, _5 D' ?: o& hF4U-1D Corsair x 20
" Y" a% m* Z) S& t) W! ?) z, ~+ k8 \9 v: s$ b" r
Japanese aircraft losses
- S4 \3 b) h7 ^$ sKi-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged . u5 b) n4 b) g- _. V/ Q+ s  I0 t
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed 5 v8 n  z! n4 H2 k+ v8 `0 I7 l
Ki-102a Randy: 2 destroyed 3 k$ T/ r/ u% {* i1 Q0 ?

# J2 C( g( |. ~& gAllied aircraft losses
; m: O9 L9 y4 ?# y! sF4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged $ _' d4 f0 X* L5 |

8 \) w8 R/ _$ Z7 c. O0 _7 }5 E7 n/ o' I& A
Japanese aircraft losses
3 f3 t; R0 r6 vKi-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged 4 M  [$ _8 d- F5 U; ]
9 y) b( T* ^3 _7 B, w
Allied aircraft losses
$ [2 ?% e) _  f* p& x: mB-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………# b; m9 K& P4 j

3 h% ^7 z' R1 f虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………1 H2 |- \6 K" A
9 A% v/ Q- f" \7 D/ w
Day Air attack on TF at 52,52 / r+ I5 E4 ?8 e8 p

, l! \6 ^; p; x( WJapanese aircraft . r0 N, x7 \0 V3 [' v$ R
A6M5 Zeke x 32 # w% Q  s' \  E1 m7 F9 b% ?  `$ k
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2
! s/ i- t9 D" P
$ u1 L; F0 O# X- S, D8 g" XJapanese aircraft losses
1 }0 X, x" P1 B2 XA6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed
! V8 i8 h8 J  v, b- ~2 t2 j1 R7 H' Z& B  [- d
Allied Ships : A+ \; y3 Z  a3 P: v
APD John P. Gray ' b- P* A; e6 r. F  [
APD Ray K. Edwards 8 f9 T8 F! w9 w* r4 G. `
AK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1
: N! u; D  K7 EDE Day
0 A+ K. S, Q' J; `  O' D3 N
7 n( ]/ h, Z8 Y% SAllied ground losses:
, N; D- s2 k; i' ^* a0 t7 d51 casualties reported 7 ^9 b+ A) z! S* A& A- n
Guns lost 2
; g! }4 L2 w5 y' T2 DVehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
4 }# U  s- D3 M& k
& W$ C4 @2 K& O+ |最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
$ J* u( @/ \/ ?& e. g
$ J8 h7 M  L$ T' V& `, k& |+ T% I& T
Ground combat at Kuala 5 k( s4 j  B7 j) I; x
6 t# ?% |; A) v8 e7 l' ~5 e
Allied Shock attack 4 ~) i+ {, b! _. z2 `

9 Z; L4 n# S5 J3 N, V: GAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2
! o) E3 b; H: a" K  R
( \3 p4 F4 O: c! Y2 vDefending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5
  m' T9 ?# v* m6 n0 c. y/ N: H( C; R8 g- Q
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0
9 Q4 L+ Q9 C: P3 ~& S8 R; y
, n& E% U$ R6 t2 X& vJapanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1 # J" Y0 V! w/ y' ?: P  e- O9 S5 T
* X6 V! u/ D( a9 E0 B0 I$ U, z9 q
Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0) $ ~: U' p" x' K& Z) B

4 W) K3 M' T. k) ^4 c  oAllied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!!
7 ^4 ~. a0 L7 |
/ Q7 l; D* O  i2 u' S1 g; B( q
& H, d- H% I. iAllied ground losses: & z/ x0 G& n+ d: [4 f: O
24 casualties reported
" V4 Q0 \! n; I5 qGuns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
返回列表