返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 * Y6 M* `( B, x+ y9 Q

( m2 V( a1 I+ i. R$ Q6 ~+ Z7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE6 ~) r5 j6 E* k. w6 f
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended# a) N& x! A; H  c1 r% r7 x
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with) }* D8 A* R4 X1 ~6 D
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of; ]) k: p5 z5 P4 ]" M
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
* M+ w2 A7 N- @# q- T+ X% l! ycould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will5 I/ {! j' U9 e4 ^: b
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
$ H0 M" T! }/ Hand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when8 y, e5 z' S# h: `1 ]$ d% ^
planning operations that require such high risk.
& t& U6 F1 @/ A谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 1 Q+ b9 O. V) f8 }1 c& K- n
$ j  ~9 ]! ?" x) ?5 e, m
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
; c# e6 n/ U# b, P* E扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表