返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
& S( c" F/ r% H4 Z+ F0 T+ S3 X, Z) H7 a) p# c3 D8 R+ ^
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE9 a0 D% Z0 O) t! ]
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
' K& M6 b+ W2 N( Srange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
3 A5 `) a- q9 d, Y9 g& V6 `' n# Rinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of( W9 |& H& j9 z4 s2 ~
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but2 r' I! H. N+ V6 C& }- b& U+ b7 D
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
5 I% l. h+ s! _& usuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal/ C' L' a$ b$ Z4 B) p9 c% k
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when4 z3 o& Q# N- U$ U
planning operations that require such high risk.
9 L' F3 n1 u0 y谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 2 z! _7 T6 K# L# f) k" q$ }

& [8 B# p0 K* k$ q0 Z* a6 [! F6 c中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
# Z+ f" r+ n; j9 K# Y7 N5 M# b; M- f扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表