返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43
9 Y8 |/ U: L, \9 n2 M& z8 E6 @0 d
% P; {: _: T( WJapanese aircraft
9 H% j8 D* Y( B8 H. y* c$ tKi-100 Tony x 36 7 u1 C) O. v1 ?0 a8 D6 u3 v( ]

6 g' D' q# j' h4 k4 ]! M" Y7 RAllied aircraft 5 {' o/ |* p3 b; ^
B-29 Superfortress x 33
5 e/ p$ Z; M8 i* ]) n1 W* U  n( {8 P* g
Japanese aircraft losses
  s, e# Z6 l6 c  k. z0 l! NKi-100 Tony: 12 damaged
( a& N3 M; k5 N+ A# j% V2 t9 a& U+ d
Allied aircraft losses
, p( v6 D& I  k' ]B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed . c9 @7 S- Q6 Z% i
3 {) L6 {# i0 C% N7 h0 L
Japanese ground losses:
3 T- a( t( g1 q8 Q, W! q. }" u34 casualties reported 5 y  X) ]2 \8 d1 t6 X/ E( j
Guns lost 1 3 C9 ]# R- ]; z

$ f# h+ B# Q' ]Airbase hits 5
1 ]: z6 I( r/ k$ P$ D7 d/ zAirbase supply hits 2 , @1 C. V8 o; T2 l3 h' d
Runway hits 13
+ k* r# Y# T& Y3 u8 U- k1 C! f" p5 A% k+ s) q. L' o
9 z1 i" O2 w( H$ ]3 t$ i
原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。
) ^" \, t0 f" ?6 K
1 `# l- r$ c! K; {/ k3 Y& i8 t  v* n3 U从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。  O/ {$ T* I' a+ z* F

( t; R' {, V1 D2 y& I, D! o- @
7 ?! T5 G7 a& k* G+ z& q2 \- KOur fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25!
! A5 O  h& M# v/ O, A; h6 w3 uCan't keep this up for long
2 Z/ l4 s2 ?& Y
( W: x1 ~  G& ]9 }1 q$ f3 I/ g( PDay Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51
5 B0 Q/ X2 f. B
6 X7 _  E. M" O5 WJapanese aircraft
$ \5 x- w! M+ X5 q1 I/ U- ]A6M5 Zeke x 20
9 t# ~9 x7 f$ Q- jKi-84-Ic Frank x 24 9 f) ]- }* g  ]% G! J$ ?

1 d& k! v2 l* HAllied aircraft 1 ^: v4 F- z4 I- t+ g; L
B-29 Superfortress x 260
0 h" C4 L) B" ^7 f: u4 _  c5 E5 b+ d! s- e& o/ y
Japanese aircraft losses
' J8 N6 [( D& S2 E1 j+ wA6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged 4 p/ J1 W8 r( F9 \
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged
+ A$ |+ N0 V: k' X9 T& Q4 B8 X8 p" v8 X; ?$ H- q; y0 y, `- B: G
Allied aircraft losses ' N1 }; L; n& F
B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged
' l  t( v, X$ l; d3 f5 H$ a7 ?, F- [% `0 ?
Japanese ground losses:
9 m( F0 u8 \2 \) @4 u( x% g204 casualties reported & r! u* P* D+ t9 |8 _, @- P+ _# w; `
Guns lost 5 - [+ o! v3 b! ~. Q9 ^6 J0 C$ V
( o; w1 }  e' R3 ~# @
Airbase hits 66
( z  t9 |) q" f1 l+ T1 uAirbase supply hits 5 : c) r5 T2 ^: w! [
Runway hits 3643 P) _" S, H: b/ z
7 u- }  e# r; Y  x

8 \* o% D. x  }) O! n这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。
1 e+ P* K; i( G; G# X8 F
& n' _, e3 L7 U+ M( F9 mDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52
* G7 q$ b, S/ o; S: S' d4 L1 Z9 t$ X% S0 _
Japanese aircraft ; U: U. R& ?9 X% n
A6M5 Zeke x 4
. ^9 e# }! y0 P# j" yN1K1-J George x 33   h4 E4 E) G' @: ~$ Q- j
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5 5 N5 W. o$ q( e  h( a  N+ J
Ki-100 Tony x 18
1 L4 {% A7 F& q  [! V5 s  O$ z5 g) `$ U; b/ m6 P6 ~
Allied aircraft ; J3 E/ S& U, t' w+ s+ o/ u
B-29 Superfortress x 155
# [; F: G, |* o" L1 b6 y
: m% ^% H  }5 wJapanese aircraft losses & s: X1 Q$ S* C* M' b4 P
A6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed ' a1 t+ j, W) L* k' F9 x9 t
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged
( |: @5 U$ T. L' c+ e  ?Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged ) H, Q* w0 j, h6 s! ]. e
Ki-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
+ `; {8 [6 x4 }; {: ZH6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed
- r. I7 k: K2 s! {Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed
& F! Z% z% E8 ~2 X$ d* q: g' RKi-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed
" T% Q8 Z' y( T5 l! E* l: j6 r, G; e: E" {) ?6 @
Allied aircraft losses 4 L: ]! s2 \6 n. o5 P
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged
' r* Y5 [% s5 n, x% d# d0 c. ?. ?! I2 v3 L0 }
[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。
. X* i% n) M' M4 r  h) c6 B& \" K* y( H0 p
Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54
8 |$ s$ W" m3 \7 E: Z0 k6 h! F$ G% w
Japanese aircraft / N1 A$ U+ N* R* [& v
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 31 ; N8 c+ Q( C( Q$ ?

  G3 W- e% N! R8 [6 l4 MAllied aircraft
; T6 t; k2 V+ y: ]1 wB-29 Superfortress x 12
& S- y* E' \7 H$ {* i
5 w4 }  t0 i1 ^# P, Z1 N$ W$ A海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。
0 b. O+ t2 Y  \4 E# n6 z  I# Z# v9 d$ y
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 $ @- F  G* w2 s

& B; M4 T1 t3 B) f2 p1 [Japanese aircraft
  l! z4 L4 p9 N" h- uKi-84-Ic Frank x 22 " C, w1 H% ~# K& B( y
Ki-100 Tony x 15 / x* F, s0 \; h% s' y+ R( ^
Ki-102a Randy x 13
7 m- Q' E2 n9 |7 Q0 V
1 c& S1 u1 v# @  U! |7 c6 bAllied aircraft # Y0 O) c( I$ Y' Z; K% x* A* |
F4U-1D Corsair x 20 ! k  B5 z2 u8 ^# ?8 H  |. \
0 t; h! ~0 c% Z4 o* `: y
Japanese aircraft losses * `7 ]* u0 l+ W: Y5 W5 g! P
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged ; p! N* F) e! t/ {7 q1 c& }4 L
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed
% m/ s) k& S' p* n8 fKi-102a Randy: 2 destroyed 7 g+ {* _- Y: r  u# x

* a2 u+ X5 ~- iAllied aircraft losses ; r/ H/ m  s/ L% i: k
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged
, H2 T% O# D7 U
/ D/ ?: @- J) H- @- E8 u* t2 d1 }, O; x' P% n7 p
Japanese aircraft losses
7 B  a+ n# w+ bKi-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged
+ [" q  w2 f6 E7 X) f7 s( I7 @" j' X4 i
Allied aircraft losses 9 |4 k: _' I0 A8 U4 M
B-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………9 d& W2 Z1 m0 ^  S( V

' p0 k1 p* r$ G  T% J虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………" e( c+ N" j- Z

3 b, P( [; A. `2 i& z$ gDay Air attack on TF at 52,52 3 M# u& M2 ?/ c# C4 y/ h

0 ]$ w, w* y) w, p: b# JJapanese aircraft
7 `! a; d' H/ LA6M5 Zeke x 32
5 b. D# e$ h& YKi-43-IIa Oscar x 2   r5 U; v, C- q8 v- ]) l7 v
$ `- K7 U8 g' _# o- y* z8 c
Japanese aircraft losses
0 J0 d' I' {+ [. ^8 E/ {  W6 W4 dA6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed
8 s) K7 N  {  N; ]: k
; C5 T/ W1 @0 n" {5 ]1 P# XAllied Ships
2 x4 J5 f" e% U6 ]3 A) YAPD John P. Gray
  H5 Q# [$ t- R2 |APD Ray K. Edwards
; n6 o* Q' P# {5 p! B  w$ K8 Y4 f5 CAK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1
4 u: H, u" R. c2 v5 g: IDE Day 2 U# `+ i8 ~- i* r4 P6 k
1 y* K7 Y% C6 F) j
Allied ground losses:
8 b3 s  r: X8 i$ \2 r8 E51 casualties reported   g5 d% ?+ d7 J2 u
Guns lost 2
1 u* \. y3 C* F) zVehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??, e, v- [8 D$ L
' ]4 G0 H% f9 L
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? * D3 F$ Q) U2 T

$ X9 X1 A# v& i5 K  |. R
- b% f! C9 h, @$ jGround combat at Kuala 6 H5 Z" R+ |( R1 n) A/ w/ y

; A% Q- N) }+ \7 BAllied Shock attack
) J& `4 c+ ~5 Z8 p4 [" x2 j
3 B1 O& v9 T" t, pAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2
2 w3 f. e7 S0 g& j- s$ ^/ ~1 \, h, C: y/ i/ T, P6 J
Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5
9 A. b5 a. T8 u8 \/ @( Q) e$ e7 r" N; N+ D& R
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0 % A6 u& I/ r* @8 ?3 W6 C( E

: B& T/ Y) U) q# J* U- v& yJapanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1 " |$ I5 z0 ?) m3 v$ E
& t1 i. F8 J: @3 f8 r" ~
Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)
, ]8 @' {9 S/ Q1 E. O
) Y. U% W. ~; [9 Q3 AAllied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!! 3 ]' u' P: H) N& P/ m* V
+ r9 H# L2 f% ]6 a3 i

% |5 ^( f( u8 Y; Z4 X2 {Allied ground losses:
$ V, B' D. R' S& Q, r6 a3 e9 a24 casualties reported 0 E! o: C! r& g) ]0 M) ~
Guns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表. s8 Z3 [" K4 T- a( F
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
$ a$ h8 n% d: L8 R( S3 ^! i' I1 _8 O
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? 6 }% X/ {  w. l4 g4 j1 h
/ S- J! v. V- s# K
2 M! U- x8 w& j0 g" E# G9 ^( b2 e' o
Ground combat at Kuala # g* `. X/ {+ j9 @
% x! H6 y0 X+ o  @6 j/ p* E7 k
Allied Shock attack + Z" x+ I7 e" A. G% V/ `& b
/ Z7 l9 _  m# ^) n& z: D& y( U: i3 Q
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
1 C& g" j" e  N7 s7 B; @( _: I" ~+ [, c% A

  E4 q' k" Y8 Z' E
4 e8 |  s  w1 n1 D& s这个…………难道最后四个都是史太龙??
这四个明显是逃兵啊,死的那24个才是战胜鬼子的英雄
一万年太久,只争朝夕!

回复 #5 bf109 的帖子

不敢相信啊,这怎么可能!
估计4个人还是剩下一门炮的炮兵。。。。。
这一场陆战真是匪夷所思啊...
死24个人打败鬼子也算惨胜了,但0:1的比分就不能理解了
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表
- W( \0 B8 E+ q* p看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
, t; ~5 R/ f3 ]5 n+ @8 y& \, e+ P/ b5 l7 `# x; r
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
4 k3 \  h' }0 Y- F3 a0 {5 Y/ V6 I- m

* y+ |4 l6 ~' m. p; ~' P3 }Ground combat at Kuala
1 \6 ^1 d6 u6 ?# Z, l* w. u4 o" L0 p! g9 ^, d+ G4 d
Allied Shock attack
+ q6 `) m$ K  l3 G$ {6 M, y* ]& Z, W9 ?( k  C, _4 Z
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
+ Y$ Q! T! @. h: p9 H9 f7 h6 f

" _6 G* k6 N6 Z5 U; i, c3 ?* S所以说游戏毕竟还是游戏。。发挥想象吧各位。。深究就没必要了哈!
那4个都是蓝博,有什么好奇怪的.
返回列表