返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43
( _7 e* k7 D) A, k3 r" b1 F+ s4 @- W+ N- b4 D" B
Japanese aircraft
# C- q2 Z! _8 a0 iKi-100 Tony x 36
0 _8 |# n; x1 F) [; q+ N# v( q& V% `3 Y+ y, m( d
Allied aircraft   a: ?8 f( j- |# E/ y% Q
B-29 Superfortress x 33
3 Q0 Q8 L8 O; B! ~4 M" _( X# Q4 a# N. O- w' i
Japanese aircraft losses
% T9 d" p0 S1 }& ?Ki-100 Tony: 12 damaged - S9 i. ]- O/ i* x

5 L3 H' g7 R8 ~9 W5 J4 yAllied aircraft losses
  d0 a# A; z# E$ q' U. _B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed
1 t' _- c. z1 P. d' p4 w
: Z' K  }/ M6 Y3 }; E7 Z) P2 VJapanese ground losses:
- P% q, C/ `" _1 Q; [* A+ a& g! S34 casualties reported
& ^8 ]! i/ y* T' \Guns lost 1 7 T$ S7 x$ p% D/ Z
8 V( |6 ~9 P& Q. E& h
Airbase hits 5
4 j/ W; b! X. z+ ~) Q% g! zAirbase supply hits 2 9 R1 B( h& q. K" y- i0 S$ E! \
Runway hits 13 7 C3 f! s! _; v( |+ @7 O

6 W8 D/ F. E5 s, i9 o' a
( \2 h* i2 b. _原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。$ [3 J, @$ w2 n, ~
, k/ n2 o+ p3 y: f. a
从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。# r2 r, b. w9 A9 m) S1 p

0 x+ B$ C* w' V$ o: b! S$ h3 S- }# c6 ]
Our fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25!
0 q, h3 B* t  zCan't keep this up for long 7 g% y% D4 c0 L  `$ I
" r* ^% r7 F- v& c9 |
Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51 ( i4 ]9 C$ ?* J* i- f3 m

/ q% k9 E7 \. t* `4 {5 CJapanese aircraft 1 c$ r( ]4 e5 E
A6M5 Zeke x 20
$ ]5 w8 V" R+ A: [Ki-84-Ic Frank x 24 3 p9 P7 x: A8 n9 b$ |% m0 V

6 s  W' X/ F# }4 l  j5 a+ K8 yAllied aircraft   i, R; c- [) O' g
B-29 Superfortress x 260
, v5 S& o! u6 V& [  O: d
- K6 Z' I4 Q; ~! k( e9 f; N( E: g) d6 hJapanese aircraft losses
1 J6 H5 E, i, R+ YA6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged
9 }* ~" }. i5 k/ c* `Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged : ^! l! P( C9 U% p7 R0 g! _6 M
$ Z; K3 e$ @% D$ K$ [  I
Allied aircraft losses * d9 @8 @# j/ T) f1 P- o2 z4 d
B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged 7 C9 s3 x% F9 K  v2 d" Q' D
9 \  P6 G9 A% d" {7 [9 ?
Japanese ground losses:
& \0 x. r3 r) l$ w3 F204 casualties reported - t+ o! j! c$ G2 O! O/ z9 c# ]
Guns lost 5 6 d9 B* E5 r9 y$ |; c: |" u9 K* o

; O" ~; l9 m, T3 a2 V: qAirbase hits 66
0 p( e: I: h8 bAirbase supply hits 5 ! h- ?1 c  d; h: ?  @' Z. o. l! r
Runway hits 364
# x$ D6 U$ S: ]0 |2 k & Q; W4 h$ N& Y2 }

+ {" T5 a. O* v# d这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。
: G5 e( p+ F( Q1 o% k7 z5 A! o
3 D5 W: a( o: w  |+ K! K- GDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 5 F& x1 M7 t# `

  ]+ q( k/ b# j6 _6 m1 PJapanese aircraft : N' e+ }3 c' c9 _
A6M5 Zeke x 4 ' K2 u- g# k6 g8 H$ |0 ~! i
N1K1-J George x 33 * t/ I! s6 E. ?
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5
' [/ Z8 |& S( }% q: o# y3 z9 _% A7 iKi-100 Tony x 18 1 Y& B" t8 H5 {2 i% p1 P, v* w0 c

; g! y3 B: }4 g  `Allied aircraft
( y' B6 j# E" A! s) L2 Y% y$ UB-29 Superfortress x 155
7 [" h% }) U: m/ C5 G
9 j; e" T% E$ C7 S- t4 FJapanese aircraft losses
* g5 C9 D, `, l- C' H) _3 f. lA6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed 1 l' g$ G$ a- u9 l% y
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged ) |4 Q+ n# |) j) d0 Z" {
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
  ?0 u6 q2 _; C2 vKi-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
4 b; b/ Q& x: b, g# DH6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed
* n3 \& j6 J* ZKi-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed
" ^- O8 K0 F  ?$ q: h) X  SKi-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed 8 ]/ P5 d: a" B% `) ~( S
) E. j8 K- B  b5 B- ?7 s7 j  d
Allied aircraft losses   U  q+ e: {/ c/ V, O: M. u1 o
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged
0 \$ W  r1 J+ j" ~& {" g* O" y3 G8 W; m
[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。 * w# w) ~3 K) g# o  m
4 y2 t9 d3 `1 b. e' i. Q
Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54 0 n: F4 p, o/ B' T' w
: H. T" b( \' S2 B: M6 v
Japanese aircraft
6 W0 ~6 W9 [& lKi-84-Ic Frank x 31
" Q/ Q# r: R) {7 |$ o/ E7 X7 b6 h
Allied aircraft $ c5 [$ r3 P1 i: J* ~! W4 I- E$ q7 g
B-29 Superfortress x 12
( Y4 q6 z& r  X0 v9 b8 t* M9 j2 Q! l* F* F% d! l7 o& Z
海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。' L) p6 c# _. r3 x6 l3 J7 [
0 B3 t" R' m  C. v
Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 ( L5 u3 f- g4 V: d( i

- H; d8 F' H* V/ Q$ wJapanese aircraft % f% e9 K# k9 N
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 22
: w8 a2 \  g3 Y: v& ~% F& M! cKi-100 Tony x 15
- D# g( }  @+ n" R9 kKi-102a Randy x 13
5 I- Q4 a- f! ^1 i' N" F. u
+ x" K# h8 x& c* Z8 H: Y3 D! SAllied aircraft
5 }: Y, G6 D. L+ o9 a5 Q% e+ V- QF4U-1D Corsair x 20 + g6 T3 V1 i- s1 g) F
$ _, C! P/ _2 Y# p& U2 P2 D
Japanese aircraft losses 8 l) K' q1 \+ H
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged 8 `3 N" K, t0 V
Ki-100 Tony: 7 destroyed
. _5 U0 Z7 X& H: VKi-102a Randy: 2 destroyed , e; u2 ~* G- `7 X9 p
! I2 u  `* E% d3 l
Allied aircraft losses , n& }; @- {& \8 e
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged
  S& {5 c. _% S
5 a% I8 k4 q+ R$ M. ?
2 e0 ~+ m: k- T. B* m  s2 EJapanese aircraft losses # M2 A# k. a7 j& z: p
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged
2 d  X( X! a7 F+ W3 y& R  p& ?8 ?' P6 Z0 j  K" e% N  \
Allied aircraft losses
8 L5 M) a2 W3 [" `- CB-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………" h6 N9 f9 i- w. s, U$ d

' a7 d3 B* _7 ^; L# M5 M% R虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………
9 Y8 ]# P7 ~2 P) G9 |( W2 U  O( k
& D7 [; J4 i' i5 H) G1 m- G( BDay Air attack on TF at 52,52
1 u. t4 F: v) y9 M9 U  Y  V# u4 W( l$ ~
Japanese aircraft
5 l. l) w% J* uA6M5 Zeke x 32 - l* O2 [5 ~# \9 z) Y' g, Q
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 2
( D: ^& y1 a! s7 u, |$ e. |5 T# @
- ~, S8 U( R- H! ~( L, ?. N. q2 eJapanese aircraft losses : F6 z% S# T  C' a' P6 t- m
A6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed
! {2 d% V2 h( `0 S( c% f" ?- v' x( h7 G3 \3 K9 \
Allied Ships
+ f# t+ c/ Z) S# LAPD John P. Gray ( H7 `8 m4 k- Y/ ]
APD Ray K. Edwards ' u- w% g; j/ g% }* }( r7 m
AK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1 + r3 [9 a+ u- y& F* y  s) E! b* K
DE Day 5 x8 w% A) k* C, q4 O
+ E7 ~% z3 y- q7 _2 n+ f5 z
Allied ground losses: 5 y: d- b+ l; H0 K4 }/ X
51 casualties reported 1 F% F, _1 R! A- Z( g/ {
Guns lost 2 0 E$ c4 g7 l6 W; @; C9 X  d9 S
Vehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
6 l+ L; ^* e9 L9 L; ~
. m- K/ X4 Q' ^; ^最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? 5 o: M/ V/ F7 t: G6 ^' u$ s; z" e
) B- _& e2 L2 C; w* {/ j

+ m# O) ~3 l, B" h# \# n- f7 HGround combat at Kuala # T; q/ E& w# O: s: S
9 i' K# [5 E; {7 q. e
Allied Shock attack # A) V9 w- ^$ P$ r0 j9 c
; x" g) W0 B- N
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2 : K" Y: T0 B0 I3 d3 `9 W" D3 R
6 Z4 @" j) F& c" N7 e. S8 I
Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5
) u; q* W9 b8 k" Y$ v( i
! X; v$ [  m& T7 mAllied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0
8 @+ ]4 H* C7 O
; L% i# y* B; B& U/ CJapanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1
4 b+ C7 y. o! H9 _
- k$ F  h- O% G. SAllied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0) 9 U) k) R/ T+ n7 K. [
1 R3 N7 l. [" |5 ?# O
Allied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!! 7 r9 ^  E; k& A. s2 ?$ U' m

  m/ Y% K6 B% }7 e1 [. g" P) [0 p, U% h6 N  i3 i2 a
Allied ground losses: 8 P& d. Y2 }6 v
24 casualties reported ( P- b8 j0 y0 H, L. m
Guns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表. z/ ~; [7 M0 F, ~  m
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??
$ I. p( n7 Y" V
/ x% b. d: `1 o, T6 N# V最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? 9 P2 Q$ P' j/ L# A: M" q0 v2 L3 j

, @3 h" c- B9 p, Z" G. r% p: N
: I9 W5 O3 n4 u( j% kGround combat at Kuala 8 f/ C& q8 W8 S) X. E3 |! X
8 g. b; m7 a2 f9 k; L$ q7 p# c
Allied Shock attack $ e2 ^$ V/ C, \

4 _+ E  w" w, sAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
: ]4 }3 I6 V" c6 c; d4 a3 U
* q) x1 e6 y6 _+ H  F' p9 o

& I9 ~+ }/ o  v* K% R这个…………难道最后四个都是史太龙??
这四个明显是逃兵啊,死的那24个才是战胜鬼子的英雄
一万年太久,只争朝夕!

回复 #5 bf109 的帖子

不敢相信啊,这怎么可能!
估计4个人还是剩下一门炮的炮兵。。。。。
这一场陆战真是匪夷所思啊...
死24个人打败鬼子也算惨胜了,但0:1的比分就不能理解了
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表0 s6 g1 Z8 y8 H- Q$ m
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??' A" ]$ X* p4 P. K- F! S/ L
8 ]- A9 A) V8 ?3 [4 ~
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? ( \, M/ V- b8 b" J. J/ i6 |
! V0 G2 H- a* f3 }: T

/ Y6 w- a9 @: v& n9 V' NGround combat at Kuala
- i- N! }' Y( d( g% j" G) [# [: j7 d
Allied Shock attack
, v1 w  r8 }; U" S6 S/ K) V  V- G1 h  w
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
2 b3 r$ x9 a, @- F

5 n' B& J1 a( ?0 {  d所以说游戏毕竟还是游戏。。发挥想象吧各位。。深究就没必要了哈!
那4个都是蓝博,有什么好奇怪的.
返回列表