返回列表 回复 发帖

日军夜战烂果然是因为没有雷达

Day Air attack on Taipei , at 50,43 ' u2 ~* t# |0 i! j4 h

8 I& {* @- ?# S1 IJapanese aircraft
& Y' [- t# j: s8 {Ki-100 Tony x 36
' Q8 w7 n- y8 q. X7 D& o* ~1 @) I& }
Allied aircraft
/ T; b. ]+ D2 d( f5 N- QB-29 Superfortress x 33 # `. b& T) l- W

; G/ ]' S* n' t" F2 J) KJapanese aircraft losses   g" o! Y$ a, O+ A1 K1 b
Ki-100 Tony: 12 damaged
! N1 f) R4 i7 K# O+ X) e, D
: A1 R% @$ j& T: K. c# YAllied aircraft losses 4 _9 S, P2 m4 ^$ a* z8 d
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed
  F  N* f+ u( |3 w# O* ~( @5 @
, c1 s: e; \2 n! ~, `9 g8 n: sJapanese ground losses:
. O1 B9 Z% ]9 L1 m) L0 S34 casualties reported 6 F1 o% P' L+ [- |
Guns lost 1
% K4 R- [4 e- ]5 f2 S: N3 J' q; K) P' V; D6 b; V
Airbase hits 5
! \8 ~2 r1 C' W( X6 I/ f0 ~; @Airbase supply hits 2
* i$ r! p% u+ a8 Z) b# D4 QRunway hits 13 / w1 f' T3 Y) R6 V

- `$ `& N- t6 m
5 Y6 `  q8 ]) ^  `原来B-29真是纸老虎,日本那么多次夜间拦截无法成功就是因为…………根本没发现…………攻击次数太少了。按说火力方面屠龙丙和月光并不比五式战差,但结果却有天壤之别。+ W, a1 ^# j8 A) W

+ ?3 h. G" X# E6 n+ j" d+ O从这些战果看,得出对付B-29的结论是,日本夜间防空没戏,速度仍旧是远远第一的重要。火力倒相对不是最重要(没有机炮的先靠边站)。; [& c5 S+ i" I$ N; d

; P& g# |) s& x: m7 w2 L$ h
8 |- b9 G0 D! R" V8 @6 eOur fighters at Clark turned back 100 B-29s, damaged 60 and shot down 25!
# v0 `3 N4 h4 O: C% N$ SCan't keep this up for long
  b/ x" {2 p6 Q: a3 j$ `9 E7 F) d5 t" X, j/ i  n
Day Air attack on Clark Field , at 43,51 " @$ ?& G2 e' }$ O
; h& Y2 t0 H1 x% U
Japanese aircraft
1 m$ _' e) B, _, r  |/ e" mA6M5 Zeke x 20 & V+ w" @0 |% o' O: h
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 24
$ [) L2 J/ v: Y, E% B# t. E# N) ]9 P% z" V3 A; o4 F; }, l
Allied aircraft + l- _8 e1 d6 y- Z# p! L
B-29 Superfortress x 260
7 {5 H0 F' e, v6 S8 Y
2 q( _0 x' q3 @' xJapanese aircraft losses 7 C. ~+ D/ T& `* A& v% j! }" E
A6M5 Zeke: 8 destroyed, 4 damaged " Z: h" p8 A, n. H1 N
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 7 destroyed, 11 damaged
0 X3 y2 I- h9 h5 l6 [/ D+ [' A3 \. G+ n6 w4 Q2 H9 U
Allied aircraft losses 5 `- b  B% u& a5 ~# F. h" e
B-29 Superfortress: 25 destroyed, 69 damaged 9 J: ]* N8 B  H6 D! X5 c
: T: T7 l$ U# P
Japanese ground losses: ! @) ^3 e, |8 u1 |2 Z
204 casualties reported - v1 Z" m$ N( j
Guns lost 5
/ E! |8 ?" N) a2 y% f  ?
4 N9 W6 E4 N( R, b2 J2 GAirbase hits 66 ( ?" ~. E0 L$ ^- g( `7 g3 ]
Airbase supply hits 5
+ Y) n+ @' d3 R5 GRunway hits 364
; ?" h- h6 S3 k; y  f0 W2 v
1 |; y$ h9 f2 W. I* U# E
8 c4 k& x9 y( S: n& R' I0 M这次为什么不用疾风丙拦截呢,我想看看30毫米炮是不是真的一点用都没有=====疾风丙都是在地面上摧毁的,空中损失的主要是五式战,紫电被击伤的多,击落的少。  E! A" `) c2 d" O* H% R' K) S

  q) r+ p& s- yDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 ' x. r( w1 w  z" C3 g4 V
& h9 k. E% _( B9 d% s5 p! a4 d
Japanese aircraft
6 S6 e: N5 [: o0 c. KA6M5 Zeke x 4 0 x+ h( z- A9 @+ e# O- C% d9 P+ V3 i
N1K1-J George x 33 - f2 U- o6 [6 r1 W$ i
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 5
! y8 F4 i5 c% F+ {) ?# Q2 V: mKi-100 Tony x 18
) Q1 E* \9 S6 N" e! G: w7 k
8 T/ W6 k7 R* o5 R* t5 [Allied aircraft   ?' F- N, `( g$ t
B-29 Superfortress x 155 5 L0 y8 R5 }* r) {
0 S3 u$ x: R, F: L7 P
Japanese aircraft losses
7 J2 U7 \( f) pA6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed ; {/ \3 I& A' v7 C* I3 N# Q
N1K1-J George: 1 destroyed, 30 damaged % h7 B4 H. c) X/ T/ X1 o# _
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
- r) b2 ?, |( E: M' Q; NKi-100 Tony: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged ; c- k; b1 ~* ?1 v4 d5 _
H6K2-L Mavis: 4 destroyed # ^, @; G7 M* r. S+ Z- r5 T
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 11 destroyed 3 I1 c; e6 i! t. B
Ki-57-II Topsy: 1 destroyed * J, V: P6 H% W- c  R  \$ i

9 o% c2 ^7 X2 NAllied aircraft losses 5 g8 h9 r5 ^( D% c- ]3 d; y
B-29 Superfortress: 20 destroyed, 61 damaged( k) i) E0 V7 }- B; k

. _4 l' q- f0 @/ n1 c% D[ 本帖最后由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:15 编辑 ]
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
疾风丙终于表演了一次,太差了…………远不如五式战,怎么搞得。 5 z% J) o# m' s, e
$ v" n% }. o/ D7 |7 g( x+ a4 U# w
Day Air attack on Naga , at 44,54
& s& h- [; f0 w
( Z$ j# C7 P9 J8 V1 d- Q0 w5 FJapanese aircraft
8 T9 C" v) y; C* `! PKi-84-Ic Frank x 31 ) j" x" H& C* c8 j! I4 T
! O  s' Q. d( z8 q
Allied aircraft , f0 |8 k/ P3 n8 v
B-29 Superfortress x 12 , X% W" _  o3 e; j( p

/ X1 |* j9 y. C$ J$ |1 U% w海盗的威力有必要大幅度降低,或者调高日军飞机战斗力,否则的话海盗等于零,因为不会有人在它出来后还坚持打下去。
7 b7 a8 g9 q2 e" m0 U. W
  O7 T# D9 k2 l9 jDay Air attack on Manila , at 43,52 6 k2 _' F/ k& L+ j& U
' ~- u, @+ \* O8 `8 h9 Z
Japanese aircraft 6 Z; w' w+ L. G, x
Ki-84-Ic Frank x 22
! B  [. E2 N1 y9 M8 EKi-100 Tony x 15 ' p! ?' Y! X4 n6 v' `! k
Ki-102a Randy x 13 0 _- Z7 Z/ ?! y. m+ P; a

  q: Z" m! t9 TAllied aircraft 8 D$ b! w8 H9 n
F4U-1D Corsair x 20 1 N: {* A& T- ~
  m6 w! d2 p7 o" k$ [
Japanese aircraft losses ( x$ M6 f  d. R3 F
Ki-84-Ic Frank: 9 destroyed, 1 damaged
3 v( _" r& n2 D$ n7 d4 tKi-100 Tony: 7 destroyed 0 w( h" ?& P/ T- B0 e$ `' F
Ki-102a Randy: 2 destroyed & W- L0 c, ?, X: L9 h  }+ p8 a
9 Z7 k+ Y7 D6 y3 o
Allied aircraft losses , I- k- K7 J' f& }
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged / I: `2 i0 J& i; E3 L5 A

1 r5 V- r: h6 d0 Z/ u
& f8 f; s; O' x% N/ EJapanese aircraft losses
- e+ z2 Q" N1 l2 i9 g6 Q6 I8 r. \Ki-84-Ic Frank: 5 damaged - l& r) b5 I. R2 |( F

; b, u9 e& @$ vAllied aircraft losses
9 X, U4 n+ Z& k! n2 _B-29 Superfortress: 3 damaged
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
198架神风出击,只击中五艘船…………程序里对后期日军战斗力的有意降低也太过分了吧,还嫌停机率不够高?早说了,Matrix还在拿做桌上游戏的态度作电脑游戏…………* t+ X* p  T" q1 m

7 p0 U  P$ y- W+ m: @虽然很多飞机无疑在没有接近目标前就被击落了,但就算没有防空…………+ H; x- N2 I7 f2 m% u- s' E
2 l; u: S, _, D8 y1 m: F
Day Air attack on TF at 52,52
/ ]/ E1 p2 B& d% g7 ?, M# c
1 y" b/ B: W1 S3 K8 a1 }1 nJapanese aircraft
# }) \( j- o3 H/ J* g/ x# n2 TA6M5 Zeke x 32
4 ?4 o. K8 o. o8 c$ oKi-43-IIa Oscar x 2
0 q: v: b6 i, I+ R' R: k
% n8 a5 ]* x. j& IJapanese aircraft losses - v$ L/ d2 l7 H% N4 r0 d8 |& _
A6M5 Zeke: 32 destroyed ; Y) W+ U8 {( ^$ E) q1 Z

6 J6 W1 |8 l$ T0 ?$ uAllied Ships 6 l. I1 b, t+ V; J0 Q& q& M
APD John P. Gray * ?# D4 e' b$ i+ s
APD Ray K. Edwards
" k- b; u, F, V2 L7 S& qAK Indian Island, Kamikaze hits 1 & o. y9 I( \. {! W& _
DE Day / O- L3 h7 `2 ]. q6 D; m
* X6 ^3 B% y/ ~. r# [( G* W
Allied ground losses: 8 w) Z0 k* d' A/ T- F5 K
51 casualties reported
- E2 P. A/ L- ?( w' xGuns lost 2 % F4 `6 c3 [4 _) [7 Z9 t* p% d* X, o
Vehicles lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
游戏里应该嵌入代码,大大增加carrier capable中队的操作损失,现在情况是损失基本跟carrier trained中队没差别。
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??% h4 \' G# m# k
4 ]8 ?5 I; u( v) B" R+ G6 [0 L  |
最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? * I) A8 a  o  B$ U  y) O) x

/ w  y- k# L1 d1 z( |- l. ?
+ d( w8 Q+ S; o. ZGround combat at Kuala
, A$ |* n: J5 d/ v. X$ K
* c* K3 M6 a& E% @3 v' IAllied Shock attack 8 p) N8 G* U6 a! _

/ f. k7 a6 W) ~" X: \* f2 ^& ?) JAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2
( @1 X- E5 i1 q1 J  C, h9 L* B1 i/ H; t+ ?/ l( F" _
Defending force 96 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5
% o* s8 @# g. K: M; D& v% a- B; R* V; [6 ^6 M, V3 m
Allied max assault: 0 - adjusted assault: 0 9 Q( Q( c$ I4 ]  h8 W" o* d6 n: U

( O4 t) L* N/ n) Q$ E2 kJapanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1 ; y/ T9 ^% v1 ~' P- Y, V4 Y) o% `
9 M+ P1 n2 Y6 Z+ z6 C/ K
Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0) " ]5 b7 ?7 K% P+ Q0 P

1 g; W$ E) i+ v& A2 tAllied forces CAPTURE Kuala base !!! + k7 g* ^' C7 ?+ n& d
& r$ f7 G. J. L3 ]& Y6 p
7 ?- W0 M3 a2 c9 h# J: W
Allied ground losses:
+ p2 C$ V2 M# m/ A8 _7 [; H24 casualties reported
' E6 z$ T0 A" X* T2 p+ q# MGuns lost 1
Soldiers and sailors would fight like madmen to hang on to the red-light district . . . wouldn’t they?
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表! [  o' Y5 X$ C( |7 _/ k4 V
看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??7 T3 Q6 H& M0 d9 \1 E$ T& F

+ j7 u9 H' g) m+ C) u0 I2 o+ e  r最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人?? ) z2 s  w: X! t

* k  P7 f3 E( Z: Q- X  X
/ I0 {/ N$ l( Z/ n# \$ i% y0 NGround combat at Kuala 1 ~7 s7 U" v7 |! [5 a" M
3 m8 k8 ]7 x, K! C' W, B2 U% Q
Allied Shock attack
$ d$ s$ Z# v5 F
; D5 r: T& @) B/ N2 pAttacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
2 }8 g  M+ p% C
$ C+ g/ x* w4 I5 k8 c8 f ) D! G3 }6 _0 D+ b
这个…………难道最后四个都是史太龙??
这四个明显是逃兵啊,死的那24个才是战胜鬼子的英雄
一万年太久,只争朝夕!

回复 #5 bf109 的帖子

不敢相信啊,这怎么可能!
估计4个人还是剩下一门炮的炮兵。。。。。
这一场陆战真是匪夷所思啊...
死24个人打败鬼子也算惨胜了,但0:1的比分就不能理解了
原帖由 bf109 于 2007-6-24 18:36 发表
" t2 u7 z$ s1 o, ~* ]8 u. D看看后期盟军强到什么地步,0比1也能赢??! P; W2 `: E+ ^/ v  U+ ~  x

1 b" H* c# C+ l; ^7 @* G" r最后死剩下的4个人打败了96个人??
8 p9 f# u- G( `! Z' \  E& M4 V
$ z  f5 Z, Y( f0 v  p! [
) ^2 }) X9 T/ f4 F# `, l! nGround combat at Kuala . l' J) F4 d% g% F

- W7 m7 P$ {4 N/ _; [6 c! w  xAllied Shock attack
4 e( @  C- z# M9 v5 m1 V9 k4 w2 x3 {2 T- J+ V
Attacking force 28 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Val ...
4 b0 S) D7 a9 x8 W6 U8 r, s! G2 x
. u2 i: `, {2 p$ U0 T6 e6 |9 O. Y, {
所以说游戏毕竟还是游戏。。发挥想象吧各位。。深究就没必要了哈!
那4个都是蓝博,有什么好奇怪的.
返回列表