返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
1 H2 o: G  y1 {' ?) |8 K0 R' k1 W' ~& |! l  `
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
  k3 t0 P# h2 b; _The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
; C9 v4 G. l  h% V6 R; L5 Arange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with' G3 i3 S& n$ k% F( f8 |, d
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
3 J/ T$ L8 K7 q( _Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
5 ^$ X/ M, S! ^# E7 B: |could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will3 x1 q6 @3 v% U+ E
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal% D4 D1 j* L/ O* \  w+ R
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when: d7 _7 n1 D. \2 i: m- [6 D
planning operations that require such high risk.9 g% r  a* E1 Q- p) o4 }
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
# [/ }: L- J/ V& C; D8 O; p' }; A1 ]
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
! p# b! |- ^  j/ I扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表