返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
: |3 j9 k% t6 y1 c& h
5 ~3 M! e) p) V9 S1 w* c" P* x7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE7 c8 p0 w* W/ r- r, \
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
! x3 y3 C' `0 x$ h  Drange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
4 `  I# h$ L3 b# o: B+ f8 K- u; R$ iinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of) B( l% F$ n5 k* P( f/ B# z1 G
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but# [3 @: m! ~8 V- Z) e) u# r
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will" [2 I! _( J& Z5 B& T
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal5 P+ y: J, g: X( r' D9 @. e5 O
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
3 I9 e% v5 i' y4 Jplanning operations that require such high risk.+ l" ~: Y* }( g5 c& |  X* [, H2 ]
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
8 n, {' p& s0 Y7 O" O& {
0 S8 V$ m7 v3 |( _9 I! b- |中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
" U" j3 M, N# k! t' w扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表