返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
0 }, Y2 g2 w7 J$ N' U4 |& `: }
6 H% s5 k* O4 w. t7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE/ C$ w8 T: l+ Z, n- N' j, h, t5 B- ~
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
8 l% l2 M9 F9 }1 qrange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with9 W  P8 ?; O9 ?, [) x, m! t6 i
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of5 r9 d2 j) d# l( r( m
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but8 c3 ^3 g% i& T6 C6 p
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
2 E) Q& x$ g) ]/ |) A% Nsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal5 f3 A5 ]+ y" G. `; A9 {
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when- P- a( K$ `, W) Z: {6 ?
planning operations that require such high risk.
! I2 n, B$ |7 k谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
: s8 ^8 w6 {: Y: q; |, h7 H# c7 P. {; q" x+ l4 B# A6 k! f
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理; b9 I5 h9 s5 }. n' q
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表