返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
, t/ n- M  s7 T8 J* w% D+ N4 q% C, r- Z2 p
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
0 y1 F2 [  A. J# n8 u+ o( H$ y2 @+ N5 kThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended& u) a" o! b' q( r$ u2 g2 p1 w  `
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
1 ^& l3 P2 E6 \0 i$ L9 F4 c+ k- Minstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
) C7 W9 z, Y+ c$ @/ VGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but3 V2 e" A: C" L& p$ V
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
/ n; H- Y% P! p; w( N$ i, k  j% osuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal* K. i* C  M, {) W" X( V
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when# v# a! w0 K2 F8 `' o
planning operations that require such high risk.
9 L4 `' F. |% d" l+ Y- R谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 6 e; a; x7 Z- w
' K. p) N( C) r1 c1 v; ]( L8 Q) g
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理7 F' h$ W9 p2 a7 N4 [
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表