返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 ! h8 R4 v3 ]! Z, `% z
! Y2 l, ?' C6 W( A* _( B
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
  C/ i6 S- _; r% S" r0 J8 D# [The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended/ N- }6 B; |6 D
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
. h0 p- M0 E; N+ E* p/ g" rinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of( H, J2 L" \" k$ a
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
" H2 a$ j. y+ v$ w" t/ a4 T" B$ \9 {could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
: ~6 e  F& ^8 n8 |( [! ^) b" W) msuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
* m% t! P( K$ t5 A  [+ r; k* Band a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when! V7 z. J) G* W/ n8 T5 N1 S
planning operations that require such high risk.9 m* q; F  |  A' i; A
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 4 G! B$ ]# b$ e; [1 v8 P
. p) a! b2 H7 x0 v' W( i
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
' F7 W  K( c6 B& L+ n扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表