返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 6 l# l5 R* _3 j& d3 N' m6 o
- w( E1 \# X0 I. k4 P/ A
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
0 q+ l# K7 T% p9 M+ u8 v+ BThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
( s! c1 V* u/ Y1 E# Rrange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
- f6 E- A" G' q2 q! \9 u* o8 einstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of7 a1 o. N7 [" s
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
6 [5 Q  H4 l# {, d) I/ jcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will6 W' b0 u: |$ g% F
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal/ E, O0 T' C2 k- u/ b
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
  g4 H+ y, y+ R7 P& U% N$ qplanning operations that require such high risk.
% F5 Y  r  p( ~  \* m8 \; x谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
' z" h. k, q- P8 \: I2 q9 x9 g) z9 \
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理. T; ~8 O% P# A) G5 {. Y
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表