返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
& R* `' N* N7 O2 X7 t& a# J
: s3 I  s: J% u2 p* `7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
, E" l. e/ N( T3 yThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
) U1 m! d6 n8 ?range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with) y  j+ g! i6 w* p4 B5 v. q
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of8 |% R- k' H5 ~3 g( L# L
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but0 U1 I( E0 u/ U0 E: T6 F0 E
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
( Z# ^! o( D' ]: w+ U$ _suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
# ^. x5 @9 R: |+ F8 C" F4 gand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
2 U% a$ H1 j! H+ eplanning operations that require such high risk.4 }2 J" o/ i% u! R. G, _4 S
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 $ G3 a3 K5 ^4 w/ @8 D+ y! m

9 s( J8 v& _- S) N中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
" V0 K% j4 D. F扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表