返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 4 h* U% ~# M5 q2 x3 m1 i  A

) e( Q4 S" v# I5 V2 s7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
& P  M% B0 O. `/ ^1 [; nThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended* k0 N& L6 H0 @! A# c; G7 W0 y
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with4 |6 k/ P. T/ Z
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
% G  u0 _0 j, a. [7 B. c6 jGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
! u- H3 O5 m9 S; p) t/ Pcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
5 B# F7 \9 Y. R$ M/ e7 Esuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
5 Z- ?% R1 q! f5 m/ Jand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
: u, n- M$ w. _: ~8 o! P* ~% b2 splanning operations that require such high risk.
" B2 Q$ ^6 o# k! Y) j. P  k7 s谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
' N6 ^& T/ p9 ~
7 D" s* f* X5 Y+ F中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理6 _/ u( z8 ]& {" r% M+ n; N
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表