返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
& \% R- i( K( H9 V6 w! l0 S
1 t! Y0 f/ U& n$ H8 Z7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE. N1 c. w! H2 _+ z9 F" `" c
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended/ I! K( g! w: a
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with: ^2 `- v4 z7 _) m$ A: V
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
! Z7 C4 D; E: W$ fGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
; t7 }9 j; `1 H2 z: ~could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will9 a" A! T9 w* c# ^0 o- X- Q$ p/ E
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal" j% ?9 S7 W& Q% J
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when; k$ u$ [% j. D( _0 O) T
planning operations that require such high risk.# H* ~! H0 y5 G5 ^1 p) H! L. H8 [' d
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
- f9 }  T; v3 H5 {0 B1 U* _# J2 |+ k9 P2 t! p7 Y
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理; p2 v- d- U, a" ?  E% P& u, l; D
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表