返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
. a% h; U& z: A1 d& F( D: ]) E% L) r
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
' J" d; ?- I" p( F) |The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended0 A4 W5 n/ I+ X' R. N4 U  z# G
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
4 E6 m- x1 L( Winstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of: L8 G4 L. H+ \, Y4 I( t
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but" u9 T9 F, I' E& O2 k0 @
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
* j% r. J: W8 X5 b  Q) tsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal7 J' j( M; o% T' \8 Z6 |
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when9 ]- ]% M0 T3 n3 S( q9 Q  t
planning operations that require such high risk., K. M) h  s2 ~4 X3 G
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑 8 F+ u. }9 d2 X) A

' b. Y) z! n& U7 J2 L中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理/ g4 P* E: E( L' [1 |) c* ~4 P* Q9 }
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表