返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 6 f: }9 l4 j' E6 o2 [
# B4 u  T  ?3 _* k: p. t) @
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
# V, _! s) |0 i, _/ d) N# ?The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended, F3 R# B8 P) P3 \6 L+ A; s
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with2 o  I( [! h: {" E
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
- k2 ?! B6 P6 H6 G1 _9 H# aGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but; w1 d. |2 l0 p. l' O5 m
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
5 v, ?, S4 M' t( Esuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal* y$ h7 X5 K% b  U- Y  L# W* O- O
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
  G3 D) Z# E- u% Q4 |" Z" R5 vplanning operations that require such high risk.' z" b' D9 p0 c: x
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
7 j, S4 n( ?' Z0 k1 n$ K) W' ^2 \. ]8 X3 O% D- B0 x" k- _# c
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理: P  S# b9 e; r& _
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表