返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑
2 r4 L; }* `5 i1 n  }  m% h; h/ s  i- e) k: j8 F! ?" |: D
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE' o  T( P/ ?* J0 `- a
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended9 A- Y3 K2 c4 _3 {8 Y$ X! m2 o6 l
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
, N+ Q- T) h6 @- ~" minstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of' m( E: u+ f. U
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but( ]  U. O" T! K% p
could not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
7 u  k% T4 j% N) K  g; Fsuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
( H* g8 {  w4 l! g; m' [9 B* \6 yand a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
  l9 ?; Y' `% W# v( }) q9 B4 mplanning operations that require such high risk.$ K8 v# T$ \! W/ B4 H# C8 G5 ?
谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
' G6 ^# G" o  a$ [4 V6 R8 [! Z' B, C6 e! W! d7 Z: f1 f! z
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理/ C7 d0 x% N2 }* R2 G
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表