返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 - z& @* d& {0 z& p7 K' i; X
- z4 `# [  ^8 i% d9 H) D
7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE
' {" ?9 \) m2 E, p8 eThe term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended& y/ N' S+ B% }$ ]6 m4 P- h
range operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with0 c7 {5 y6 R' W/ p; b2 P; n' B
instances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of9 V% i% ~. |. \& t1 O
Guadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
* ~; o1 d! U0 j5 H2 f) i* V; _/ dcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will3 o" }: l+ j9 _$ A- a
suffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal
/ q+ P- S+ I" |; J% _and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when
$ z. B- i5 q6 n: P) F3 Y" F# jplanning operations that require such high risk.
( X: _6 O" ?& J! g" r谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
7 Z3 c- G- d  N$ ?% k7 m7 K8 n; x! L: D% ?/ ^
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理) J% I5 w5 y8 n$ l$ r6 H
扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表