返回列表 回复 发帖

[AE] 关于飞机扩展航程的问题

本帖最后由 redpeacock168 于 2012-2-17 11:35 编辑 ; N- t6 [+ n6 B3 i( b7 j8 O

# Q! L5 U8 P% n: N7.2.1.6.1 EXTENDED RANGE. t6 W$ S1 s4 h: @( L
The term takes on new meaning in AE. Less forgiving rules are in place to make Extended
( C1 e, t! j$ b' m( x5 Yrange operations, both Clean and Drop Tank equipped, unsustainable. WWII is abound with
& r! ]- x' ~5 J7 I8 M% v" Xinstances of extreme operations such as the Doolittle raid and the Battles over the skies of
$ B1 W! G1 o0 m% f2 k. k+ NGuadalcanal. These operations were possible and had an effect of one kind or another, but
) d1 B& ]  ^4 Q# M  O' r6 kcould not be considered normal or sustainable. As such, combat effectiveness as a whole will
& L/ P) r0 P* a) J% O6 R* @. ssuffer at these ranges. The smallest scratch could mean the difference between a warm meal* E$ P( m- G9 V/ t( _
and a rack, and a survival situation. If you value your Air Forces you will use discretion when2 u6 y* E* \# q6 d- |  {4 n
planning operations that require such high risk.
1 B5 K" k7 I; n谁能分析下这句话,我粘贴的,不知怎么中间有空格了,麻烦高手给翻译下,好像是说AE的扩展航程概念与原版不同了。
求翻译
看懂一点点,意思是扩展航程战斗会有风险?
本帖最后由 jay102 于 2012-2-17 11:45 编辑
* c; E+ f8 y* w* G9 e& b; P" D/ o+ }) p  f( w/ k
中心意思就是AE里使用扩展航程所致的风险比WitP时代更高了。
意思就是 用扩展航程就像杜立特空袭那样 并不应该被看作常态 除非你觉得有必要用
AE里日本是架0战就可以从拉包尔sweep瓜岛,还可以把盟军的CAP扫的生活不能自理
5 l$ g, G' q  ~3 M, L  g扩展航程仍然做的不够好,当然损失率是大大提高了的,作战效能也会下降
"I have nothing to offer but supplies, fuel and women."
扩展航程的概念在AE里具有了新的内涵,更苛刻的规则使得扩展航程任务(包括普通的和增挂副油箱的)无法持久。尽管二战里存在着大量极端型的行动,如杜利特轰炸和瓜岛空战,确有可行性且产生了某种特定影响,但其不应被视为常规的和可持续的。在扩展航程上作战,综合作战效率必然下降,机身最轻微的擦挂都有可能决定飞行员的存亡。一个珍惜空军的人在计划此类高风险行动时将会谨慎从事。
返回列表