惊动LUCK版主了,真不好意思
/ b V3 w) V4 s3 z那我就把问题的分歧列出来,大家一起来看# B0 H! p6 {+ n4 i4 G( j9 m
第一,究竟是谁先发现了谁,按某人的话说是德国人先敌发现的.理由,好像没给出来- k1 s" k! ] ?* _" A! g ~
At 0430 on 9 April the Gneisenau reported a radar contact, and both ships went to battle stations. About 0507 the enemy opened fire.
0 v3 z" M; a# p; e5 u我的说法,英国人先发现并且准备开火时,德国人还不知道英国人的方位,英国人打出了奇袭理由如下:1,英国人雷达技术先进,2,当时的气象条件和时间条件明显有利英国,英国这边天是黑的,德国那边是亮的.9 t0 ^5 ~2 ]; d) {
The battle opened at 0337 with the Renown having increased speed to 20 knots after spotting the two German ships. Renown was steaming west of the German's position giving her the advantage of being against the still dark sky while the German ships were silhouetted against the lightening eastern sky in morning nautical twilight. At 0405 the Renown opened fire on the Gneisenau whose crew was uncertain about the identity of the Renown and taking the Scharnhorst by surprise.
- H( l$ f( f4 U第二,究竟是多少距离开的炮,某人说11000码,我的意见19000码0 K$ i' f: K/ V: [# o! h$ V2 U
第三,什么时候取得的命中弹
6 D$ G: Y3 y3 m1 i第四,时间上的问题,实际上,时间如果从时区的角度考虑,是可以对上的.刚还差一个小时左右.而且我发现了一个很有意思的问题,按某人的话说,At 0430 on 9 April the Gneisenau reported a radar contact,是德国人先发现的,而我的观点说The battle opened at 0337 with the Renown having increased speed to 20 knots after spotting the two German ships.,换算成等效时间的话,正好差7分钟,嘿嘿,某人来证明下,这篇战史记载究竟是如何能准确到这种地步,另外把我前面的雷达和时间问题解决. |
发表于 2008-10-9 13:19
| 
