返回列表 回复 发帖

对汉化witp游戏的一点提议

本帖最后由 kong12 于 2009-10-29 15:40 编辑
/ V& z# `" Z0 J/ `( g
. W$ y# k* e8 x, S英文手册原文
; [6 {4 e$ n7 f. p: f, w5 s1 B+ ^- I5 Q
When a TF is docked in a port, its ships are still listed as part of the TF.
" ^8 `1 u7 v: v  T0 T6 Z1 D% h( s! Q
. k4 _- P( u; IA TF may disband itself if it is in a hex with a friendly port with a current size of at least 3. When a TF is disbanded, each of the ships that were in the TF will replenish its ammunition. Ships at a friendly port with a current size of at least 3 may exist in the port separate of a task force in which case they will maximize their repair capability at the expense of additional vulnerability to enemy air and ship bombardment attacks (this is considered being at anchor).
, X2 S* e3 z8 v' \9 x0 `4 D3 N& W8 z
就是说dock 是 停泊(舰队不解散只靠港), anchor是抛锚(即舰队解散在港口里): r$ Q9 ^5 U5 F  \& o

  g% @3 h! _/ v) S( j% Z中文witp的基地信息界面里的 停泊在某港的船只 会引起歧义。 建议改为 抛锚 符合原意。
本帖最后由 kong12 于 2009-10-29 09:45 编辑 " B6 o! K! d- i$ u7 Y' t" s5 o
- q# U8 n& P; ?0 g8 ]9 `4 `
清楚这个区别挺重要的  l- F# |0 D3 F* S6 n
2 Z; _. D$ l9 c: a
抛锚或者停泊的船只不会受到因航行引起的系统损伤。(和舰队在海上对比)
% U! W' T+ W/ }空袭会对停泊的舰队造成更大杀伤(和舰队在海上对比)8 j; k0 \4 `  M: h; y" H) W; p% F( }$ r
空袭和对岸炮击会对抛锚的船只造成更大杀伤(和舰队停泊对比)2 [4 J# J8 ^* e7 c
我军舰队只有对岸炮击才能攻击敌军抛锚的船只。7 ?0 X, R( b* s7 ~7 u
潜艇无法攻击抛锚的船只或者在3级或以上港口停泊的船只。6 @9 ^! T& V- x) `& [
抛锚的船只和停泊的舰队相比,能最大的发挥修复能力。
停泊应该是在港口所在60英里的格子里巡航,抛锚是解散编队进入港口的泊位, ?9 k9 k/ i- z8 K, _5 o# {4 w
左京大人 发表于 2009-10-29 10:59
$ R# y* ~8 `- E) O4 V: A4 Q! D* X
; j! {. w0 t! g3 ^; U/ A+ j
你说的那个是出港,停泊是要舰队进港才算的。
# I' E* Z4 a; d( ]! d1 c9 c" A可以在舰队信息界面最左上角看到
返回列表